Modern Species

Evolve :: The latest from our studio blog

Jan 24, 2012 Posted by: Jen

The Prius is Ugly

When Toyota first rolled out the Prius, my reaction was the same as many others; Wow, that’s an ugly car! I assumed this hybrid metal snot rocket would see poor sales until the makers redesigned the car to be less space-pod-esque. Ten years and over 1 million sales later, I have come to the sad conclusion that the eco-movement has popularized ugly design. This is my plea for it to stop.

As I have complained before, I have a difficult time finding eco-conscious clothing for my husband because the options are either highly designed, exclusive and expensive, or something resembling a converted sack that you would only expect a person to wear after taking a vow of poverty or right before depositing daisy stems in a row of soldiers’ guns.

In the case of both the Prius, the tailored potato sack, and often eco-architecture, the unspoken meme seems to be that eco design should stand out. Stick out. Be noticeable to the point of being alien. The consumers of these designs are said to be participating in conspicuous conservation – purchasing recognizably eco options so that the world may know that they are conscientious consumers.  

So is buying eco without being noticeable like the tree that falls in the woods with no one to hear it? Why doesn’t the Honda Civic Hybrid, which looks just like the standard, sell better than the Prius? Why can’t I purchase a men’s dress shirt made in organic or recycled cotton rather than regular cotton? Is it really so bad to blend?

And even better than blending, can’t we do it better rather than differently? Does Apple sell millions of products every year because it takes them back and recycles them when you want to upgrade? Or do they sell because they function better than the competition? Do Target shoppers put Method soaps in their bathrooms because they are biodegradable or because they look downright decorative?

The environmental movement, much like any other movement, is in need of converts in order to succeed. Well, how many more converts would the world see if eco-design were simply better functioning, better looking products, rather than oddly noticeable? We have the option to either stand on a soap box and shout our more-eco-than-thou credentials, or win over the world with beauty and simplicity. But this market can only be created if it is demanded. So the next time you buy, think of which way would you rather be swayed.

Photo Credit: TTTNIS

3 CommentsThank You!

Tom Michlig's comment is: // Jan. 24, 2012

Ha, interesting. I never considered that the odd (OK, ugly) profile of hybrids could be an intentional way of attracting conspicuous consumers/conservationists. As those things go, the latest incarnation of the Honda Insight is a step in the right direction, as previous models were funky/ugly with rear tire skirts and the like.

Jen's comment is: // Jan. 24, 2012

I agree that the current Insight is a big step up from the first year model, but I’m so disappointed with Honda for just making it a Prius twin (of course I’m still trying to forgive Honda for abandoning the body style of the 1998 Accord). The Nissan Leaf is another example of the look-at-me-I’m-a-hybrid body style. They both serve as further proof that car manufacturers have identified that eco-consumers want the hybrid ‘look’ as badly as they want the mileage benefits. If not more. Until this turns around, buying eco automobiles may leave conscientious consumers relegated to space pods. Viva la Chevy Cruz!

Ron's comment is: // Jan. 24, 2012

Good catch!  It may be that perceptions, or intended impressions, are more powerful in the garbled abstractions of the human mind (sometimes?) than bothersome pragmatism.  Take the Honda Fit or standard Civic for example.  Either, in reality, does almost as well on mpg without pretension, and without the carbon footprint (or price tag) needed to produce a several hundred pound battery that will likely suffer the fate of any other rechargeable battery one has experienced - several hundred pounds of battery, along with a redundant power train, creating a car much heavier (and hungrier going up hill) than its shape and size attempt to suggest.  I say go honest-green with all electric (and just don’t wander far from home) or with any of the small cars that now get 40 mpg with a singular power train until the industry (and government) decides to appeal to reality more than green-elitist perception - like with hydrogen or something.  Then maybe form should follow function and how cool-looking might that be?

Your email is never published or shared.
Required fields are marked *.





RSS

Change :: Email Newsletter Sign Up

Rest assured friend, your email will not be shared and we will only send you awesome stuff. Required fields are marked *.